Computed Tomography Characteristics of Patients with Functional MR Receiving MitraClip

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Percutaneous leaflet repair with the MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Menlo Park, CA) is safe and effective in patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Residual or recurrent MR may occur in up to 40% of patients and is associated with persistent symptoms and impaired survival. The anatomical characteristics associated with residual or recurrent MR after MitraClip are not well defined by computed tomography angiography (CTA) in FMR population. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with significant FMR, who underwent retrospective-gated CTA at Minneapolis Heart Institute between July 2015 to January 2020, identified those who underwent percutaneous leaflet repair with MitraClip. Anatomical and functional parameters were assessed by pre-procedure CTA and compared between those with and without residual (≥2) MR. Results A total of 25 patients were included (median[Q1, Q3]; age, 80[75, 85]; 44% men) and classified into ventricular FMR (V-FMR, n = 12) and atrial FMR (A-FMR, n = 13) according to anatomical and functional characteristics by CTA. 50% of V-FMR and 38% of A-FMR had residual/worsening MR. Among V-FMR patients with residual/worsening MR, shorter coaptation length was observed (2.2[2, 2.3] mm vs. 3.5[3, 4], p = 0.006) (Figure). No differences in anatomical or functional characteristics were seen in A-FMR patients. Conclusion Longer coaptation length in V-FMR is predictive of successful MitraClip procedure, whereas mitral annulus size and cardiac volumes are not. Total (N = 12) No residual/no worsening MR (N = 6) Residual/worsening MR (N = 6) P value Septal-lateral diameter, mm 31.9 (30.5, 37.9) 32.2 (30.1, 39.8) 31.9 (29.5, 35) 0.749 Annulus area, cm² 11.2 (10.4, 13.6) 11.3 (10.1, 14.6) 11.1 (9.6, 12.6) 0.631 Tenting area, cm² 1.6 (1.3, 2.1) 1.6 (1.2, 2.2) 1.7 (1.2, 2.3) 0.873 Tenting height, mm 8.5 (6.5, 9.7) 8.5 (6.6, 9.3) 8.3 (6.3, 10.1) 0.749 Coaptation length, mm 2.6 (2.1, 3.5) 3.5 (3.0, 4.0) 2.2 (2.0, 2.3) 0.006 Total (N = 13) No residual/no worsening MR (N = 8) Residual/worsening MR (N = 5) P value Septal-lateral diameter, mm 32.3 (29.5, 39.0) 32.0 (29.2, 39.9) 34.3 (30.8, 39.02) 0.464 Annulus area, cm² 10.3 (9.2, 14.7) 10.2 (9.0, 14.6) 12.4 (9.4, 14.7) 0.661 Tenting area, cm² 1.2 (0.8, 1.8) 1.1 (0.7, 2.2) 1.3 (0.7, 1.8) 0.884 Tenting height, mm 5.5 (4.1, 6.9) 6.3 (4.1, 8.7) 4.6 (3.7, 5.8) 0.213 Coaptation length, mm 2.3 (1.5, 2.8) 2.5 (1.4, 3.5) 1.9 (1.5, 2.6) 0.464 Comparison of baseline CT parameters between no residual/ no worsening MR and residual/ worsening MR Abstract Figure.