Diagnostic Performance of Multiplex Lateral Flow Tests in Ambulatory Patients with Acute Respiratory Illness

Caitriona Murphy, Loretta Mak,Samuel M. S. Cheng,Gigi Y. Z. Liu, Alan M. C. Chun, Katy K. Y. Leung, Natalie Y. W. Sum,Eero Poukka,Malik Peiris,Benjamin J. Cowling

medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)(2024)

引用 0|浏览12
暂无评分
摘要
We assessed the performance of three different multiplex lateral flow assays manufactured by SureScreen, Microprofit and Goldsite which provide results for influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and SARS-CoV-2. Between 4 April and 20 October 2023, 1646 patients 6 months and older presenting to an outpatient department of a hospital in Hong Kong with ≥2 symptoms or signs of an acute respiratory illness were enrolled. The point estimates for all three multiplex tests had sensitivity >80% for influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 compared to PCR, and the tests manufactured by Microprofit and Goldsite had sensitivity >84% to detect RSV. Specificity was >97% for all three tests except for the SureScreen test which had specificity 86.2% (95% CI: 83.9% to 88.3%) for influenza A. Sensitivity was lower than reported by the manufacturers, resulting in a higher risk of false negatives. The three multiplex tests performed better in patients with high viral loads.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Rapid antigen test,Lateral flow assay,Sensitivity,Specificity,Influenza,COVID-19,RSV
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要